• Welcome to Orpington Astronomical Society.
 

News:

New version SMF 2.1.4 installed. You may need to clear cookies and login again...

Main Menu

IC1848 the Soul/Cat nebula

Started by RobertM, Sep 23, 2012, 19:56:07

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RobertM

This is just over 4 hours with the hyperstar and C11 (121 x 120s with 9 subs lost due to oval stars), again the regreased NEQ6 with SKF worm bearings did the business.

I'm having a great deal of difficulty colour balancing this one so I've posted the substandard one for now - please ignore the colour!  It shows a lot of promise so hopefully I'll update it when I sort myself out.

Edit - old image removed

MarkS

#1
Yes - it certainly shows a lot of promise.  
Looking forward to the final result   ;)

As I said before, it'll be a very interesting comparison:  Hyperstar vs Bananascope

Will you be adding diffraction spikes?   :twisted:


JohnP

Yep looking good Robert. Need to colour in those stars... :-). Look forward to final vers.

RobertM

#3
Now mostly sorted but there are tooooo many stars !!!!



Max res: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8449/8024581859_80da66517b_o.jpg

MarkS


Beginning to look really good now!

The colour balance certainly looks better.

Mark

RobertM

Completely reprocessed.  I've cut out any subs that had a colour cast because it was too near dawn and got something I'm more happy with.



Link to full sized version: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8030/8027935510_4e759450fb_o.jpg


MarkS

#6
Looking even better now!

Quote from: RobertM
I've cut out any subs that had a colour cast because it was too near dawn

This causes a problem for the sigma stacking as well - especially when combining data from different nights with different background gradients - it leads to a "posterised" effect in parts of the image.

I now have a solution to this - it enabled me to throw all the different nights data from Makarians Chain into one stack without colour casts, posterisation or severe gradients.  Essentially, the idea is to select a reference sub with the least gradients and then remove the differential gradients from all the others after registration but before stacking.  I'm still experimenting with the best way of doing this.  But the technique is looking very valuable.