• Welcome to Orpington Astronomical Society.
 

News:

New version SMF 2.1.4 installed. You may need to clear cookies and login again...

Main Menu

Cone, Fox fur and surrounding region

Started by MarkS, Feb 21, 2012, 23:19:07

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkS

I added another 45 subs to this last night.

So the image below is a combination of:
60 x 5 min ISO 800 with CLS and UV/IR filters
45 x 5 min ISO 800 with UV/IR filter

As usual, H-alpha modified Canon 350D on Tak Epsilon 180ED.



I not terribly happy with the result, partly because I need to do a full re-process from scratch.  But also because I think it is suffering from the Canon's lack of sensitivity to H-alpha.  I also think some proper luminance subs would help to pick out the dusty bits better.  I'm beginning to seriously consider a dedicated astro-cam.  There, I've said it  :o

Larger version here:
http://www.markshelley.co.uk/Astronomy/2012/cone19022012.jpg

Mark


Rocket Pooch


PhilB

Quote
...not terribly happy with the result...

It's still a very nice image, Mark.

What sort of dedicated camera are you considering?
"Never worry about theory as long as the machinery does what it's supposed to do."  Robert A. Heinlein

MarkS

Quote from: PhilB
What sort of dedicated camera are you considering?

Ideal camera would be based on a APS sized Sony Exview HAD CCD II (or slightly larger then APS).  Trouble is, Sony only make pretty small Exview HAD CCD II chips.  So any dedicated camera is going be be a compromise :-(

Mark

RobertM

Quote from: MarkS on Feb 22, 2012, 06:45:56
Ideal camera would be based on a APS sized Sony Exview HAD CCD II (or slightly larger then APS).  Trouble is, Sony only make pretty small Exview HAD CCD II chips.  So any dedicated camera is going be be a compromise :-(

I think if Sony ever made one of those chips APS size then they would fly off the shelves.  As it is the smaller chips are very tempting.

I do agree with you about the image.  Excellent though it is, it's missing a lot of Ha detail - maybe a reprocess would tease out some more.

Robert

Fay

Mark, you sound like you will need counselling after that confession?   :lol:
It is healthier to be mutton dressed as lamb, than mutton dressed as mutton!

mickw

I think it looks great.

No need to get a cooled CCD on my account  :twisted:
Growing Old is mandatory - Growing Up is optional

Rocket Pooch

Mark,

Is it worth while getting the camera when the scope hads square stars?  I must admit I'd probably change the scope 1st IMHO?

Or maybe both?  Not sure you can get the resolution from the scope to get rid of the squareness of the stars.

Chris