• Welcome to Orpington Astronomical Society.
 

News:

New version SMF 2.1.4 installed. You may need to clear cookies and login again...

Main Menu

This is bad.... NGC891..

Started by JohnP, Dec 13, 2005, 21:32:35

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JohnP

Hi All,

Wasn't sure whether or not to post this..... before you look it's bad... It's my first attempt with my newly modified 1004 security camera. It's a 'didi' little security webcam with a B&W ccd chip (same as Chris's old SAC8) that took me about a year to modify & get working (just don't ask me about it...) In fact if I hadn't spent so many hours on this project I would have given up months ago.  Anyway image is taken at prime on my MN56 & represent sum of 33 X 15 sec exposures (no peltier cooling) - darks & synthetic flats applied. Chris gave me a demo of AIP4WIN & I have just about played with every processing/ post processing technique/ algorithm. Don't ask me what I did I never documented it all but I think just about everything & a bit more - in fact I was in two minds as to whether or not publish it as it's almost too far processed. The image still has loads of problems - bloated stars, gradients on the background & dark shadows to the right of the stars - still the camera only cost £40. I'm very jealous of Mikes Ha images of this a few months back...

I've a long way to go but I guess I can use this as a starting point... Peltier cooling next I think...

Cheers,  John



Rocket Pooch

Hi John,

You must do this http://www.leadbeaterhome.fsnet.co.uk/1004xcam3.htm

It shows the problems you are having, the lines may be readout noise, try the bias frames and also create a master flat as well.

Chris

JohnP

Cheers Chris - I've been studying Mr Leadbetter's pages in detail & also had a few emails with him. I'll probably adopt his method of cooling (even just for a quick test) & see what difference it makes.

Thks,  John