• Welcome to Orpington Astronomical Society.
 

News:

New version SMF 2.1.4 installed. You may need to clear cookies and login again...

Main Menu

M31 reprocessed

Started by JohnH, Nov 20, 2020, 18:33:32

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JohnH



This is a reprocessed version of M31, all data gathered on 3rd November.

ASI1600MM Pro.
Sharpstar 15028 HNT

LHaRGB

As an experiment I have thrown Pixinsight at it. To me, I am astonished by the amount of detail I have captured even though it is still fairly noisy and I suspect that some of the nebulosity is processing artefact.

To be fair:

1) There was a 95% illuminated Moon about 60 degrees away from M31,
2) there was a lot of blotching in the background which I have struggled to get rid of, and
2) I still do not really know what I am doing!

However, I do like to think I am getting better.

John
The world's laziest astroimager.

NoelC

Excellent scale and a huge amount of detail there John.
Very well done getting to grips with PI (something I've not managed).

Speaking as a non-expert; I suspect the sharpening has overcooked some of the stars making them a bit hollow, and there is a distinct fabric texture around the M32 and a sort of curdled look to some of the nebulosity as if it's been over sharpened. Is it possible to back off the deconvolution a few notches?

But the detail and colour you've captured makes a very pleasing image.  Well done.
Noel
Swapped telescopes for armchair.

Roberto

Looking very good John!  The dust lanes you have managed to extract look amazing  8)

Roberto

JohnH

Noel and Roberto, thanks for the encouragement.

I really did throw the Pixinsight equivalent of the kitchen sink at the image to see what could be done and so I am not surprised it looks a bit overdone.

From further reading I suspect that I have been taken in by the "Focal Ratio Myth". I had been working on the basis that f2.8 meant that I needed less time per channel but it really means more but shorter exposures. So my L filter was 100 x 20 second exposures and benefited enormously when turned into a "Superluminance" by adding 30 x 40 second reds, 20 x 90 second greens, 20 x 120 second blues and 10 x 300 second Ha. However, the colour filter frames should have been a much longer total exposure.

Also, the exposure times of the colour frames was arbitrary. I have now taken the transmission curves of the filters and the Qe curve of the camera and done a back of the envelope approximation which suggests that the overall transmission across the wavelength range of the RGB filters is consistent.

It is all part of the learning curve.

John
The world's laziest astroimager.

Carole

Now that is looking great, well done. 
Also well done for mastering Pixinsight.

Carole