On a roll last night...........................18x600, 7nm ha, QSI/Leitz @F4 171111
(http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6038/6358266021_88da592b19_b.jpg)
Wow!
Very nice indeed Fay. Lovely field of view and excellent detail. That image cannot be faulted!
Mark
Thanks Mark I had to get outside to see if the camera focused ok with the lens. It has taken a while to get the right safe seating for them. I now have to test focus with QSI/zs66/ 0.85 fr, as the scope has a nice wide field
Do you have a full size version?
That is wonderful Fay.
that is full size, i think
Brilliant image Fay.
Which monthly's are fighting to print this one for their December issue. :)
Tony G
thanks Tony. Well I am thinking I should have had a go at OIII, bit of colour. I'm building up to it now
Very good fay!
very nice.
Mac
Bloody hell Fay - gobsmacked - Absolutely superb - you must be well chuffed...I know the camera cost a lot but out of interest what did you pay for the lens...? I know I have said it before but it is crying out for colour you have to start doing some RGB... or narrowband colour (I prefer RGB though)
Agree with Mark can we see a larger version - I would be interested in seeing a full size crop of a section of the image. Your image might show the full FOV but it is certainly not full size.
I also really like the California neb - It has a real Ethereal Beauty about it - expertly processed with loads of fine detail - Again it would be good to see a larger version. I must say you are really starting to reap the benefits of all those nights of agony you have had getting to grips with the QSI.
John.
John such nice words, bordering on the poetic! The lens was around £500 i think. I know what i am doing. Selecting large instead of original size in Flickr.
I have been outside to see if the WOZS66 /WO 0.85fr & QSI will focus. Well I had to put the QSI extension tube on to get more back focus. I thought all was well but when I zoomed in nearly all the stars were flaring. I am thinking the FR does not match the camera. But i would rather the camera was suspended by threads than one screw if I removed the FR.
Any clues? I went to two sections of sky but the result was the same.
Also, yes, I am getting my brain in gear for some colour. I do like hubble palette, but i really like Niks bi colour imaging. There was an article on one of the foums on how he does it but I cant find it. He used HA & OIII
Also, it maybe a palavar, because, my ha filter is Baader but the OIII is Astronomik, probably not parfocal.
Quotebut i really like Niks bi colour imaging
...Is that where you use filters with a male thread on one side & a female thread on the other...... ;)
Quote from: Fay
... nearly all the stars were flaring.
[snip]
Any clues? I went to two sections of sky but the result was the same.
Not sure what you mean be "flaring".
Post an example so we can see and comment.
Mark
ok will do Mark
One sub test of QSI & WOZS66 with dedicated flattener. i thought i had focused before I zoomed in. I should have made this another post
Does the flattener not match? Or is it out of focus?
Thanks
(http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6229/6369821411_24f7b6ca9b_o.jpg)
Do you have the correct spacing between flattener and CCD?
Fay, It's fine to link to huge versions if you like, but please can you put slightly smaller versions inside the IMG tags?
ok Rick
Perhaps not Mark. I had to add the QSI spacer, which screws into the camera & into the flattener. Or the camera may be too heavy for the focuser tube, as it has to be quite a way out
What do you think?
Does the QSI spacer put the flattener at the correct distance from the QSI ?
perhaps not, will have to do some testing & see if I have a narrower one that fits