Author Topic: Mark's Updated Site  (Read 144 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MarkS

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 6870
Mark's Updated Site
« on: Nov 09, 2017, 21:13:17 »
Finally, I've got round to putting the last 3 year's worth of images on my website.

Thanks to Carole for making me do it :)

Here you go:
http://www.markshelley.co.uk/Astronomy/

Enjoy!

I intend to totally revamp it at some point but at least it's now up to date.

Mark

Carole

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 7007
    • Carole's images
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #1 on: Nov 09, 2017, 21:45:57 »
Well at least you put them all in a safe place, it's just that no-one else could see them Mark.

Carole

JohnP

  • Non-OAS
  • Cluster Class
  • *
  • Posts: 1558
    • JP Astro Images
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #2 on: Nov 10, 2017, 20:15:49 »
Nice Mark.. Superb images.. funnily enough I updated my webpage last week with images I took in 2013... None to add since but at least its up to date now as well ;-)

MarkS

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 6870
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #3 on: Nov 11, 2017, 16:02:07 »
I found 6 images from 2014 that were not on the site - that's nearly as bad as John!  They are there now, including the image of Comet Lovejoy and M79 which was published in Astronomy Now.

I have also added a brand new section for all my videos and timelapses.  If the link doesn't appear in the left hand frame then right click and reload/refresh the frame.

Mark
« Last Edit: Nov 11, 2017, 16:57:06 by MarkS »

JohnP

  • Non-OAS
  • Cluster Class
  • *
  • Posts: 1558
    • JP Astro Images
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #4 on: Nov 11, 2017, 19:13:07 »
Yep been looking at the vids you have some awesome footage. That camera of yours still amazes me. John

MarkS

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 6870
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #5 on: Nov 11, 2017, 19:58:27 »
Thanks John!

Carole

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 7007
    • Carole's images
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #6 on: Nov 11, 2017, 20:32:05 »
The videos are also great.

Carole

MarkS

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 6870
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #7 on: Nov 12, 2017, 11:56:51 »
I'm now working on the full  review of the A7S  8)

It will bring together in one place all the various bits of analysis that I have done over the last 2.5 years - presently scattered all over the internet where unfortunately it is mixed with unhelpful comments from the star eater deniers and the concentric banding deniers.

Mark

JohnP

  • Non-OAS
  • Cluster Class
  • *
  • Posts: 1558
    • JP Astro Images
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #8 on: Nov 12, 2017, 12:18:02 »
Excellent will be good to see. I suggest you send a copy direct to sony as well.... john

Carole

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 7007
    • Carole's images
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #9 on: Nov 12, 2017, 14:16:01 »
Yes its always good to centralise stuff, and you can omit the unhelpful bits. 

Carole

MarkS

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 6870
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #10 on: Nov 14, 2017, 06:09:30 »
« Last Edit: Nov 14, 2017, 06:37:04 by MarkS »

JohnP

  • Non-OAS
  • Cluster Class
  • *
  • Posts: 1558
    • JP Astro Images
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #11 on: Nov 14, 2017, 08:53:12 »
Mark, thorough report & nothing less than I expected from you - very good indeed - John

Carole

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 7007
    • Carole's images
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #12 on: Nov 14, 2017, 12:34:32 »
Very thorough and interesting read.

You did write that there was poor software support but I don't recall reading that you had to write your own capture software. 

Carole

MarkS

  • O. A. S.
  • Galaxy Cluster
  • *
  • Posts: 6870
Re: Mark's Updated Site
« Reply #13 on: Nov 14, 2017, 23:24:19 »
Quote from: JohnP
Mark, thorough report & nothing less than I expected from you - very good indeed - John

Thanks John!

Quote from: Carole
Very thorough and interesting read.

You did write that there was poor software support but I don't recall reading that you had to write your own capture software. 

Good point, I'll add a section for that.

Mark