• Welcome to Orpington Astronomical Society.
 

News:

New version SMF 2.1.4 installed. You may need to clear cookies and login again...

Main Menu

Rosette Nebula NGC 2244, 29 Nov 2011

Started by MarkS, Nov 30, 2011, 10:44:43

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MarkS


Here is last night's Rosette, NGC 2244.

As usual, H-alpha modified Canon 350D on Tak Epsilon 180ED.  This time with CLS and IR/UV filters.
59 x 5 min at ISO 800  (out of 72)
6 x 150sec at ISO 400 (out of 12)
Passing high level cloud made some of the subs unusable.



Larger version here (2/3 scaled):
http://www.markshelley.co.uk/Astronomy/2011/rosette29112011.jpg

I'm finally getting a chance to image last Winter's target list!

Mark




Carole

Now that is smooth Mark, I can't see any noise at all. 

Was just thinking maybe you could bring out a bit more contrast, though we all have our own preferences.

I know what you mean about the passing cloud, I have to discard some of my subs from last night too.

Carole

RobertM

I have to agree with Carole.  Maybe a tinge more contrast and perhaps lighten the background a tad to bring out more of the surrounding nebulosity if the image can take it.  Even so it's still very good with nice sharp stars across the image.

I left my system imaging this the other night but there must have been a sharp drop in temperature after I left it as nearly all the subs were defocused :(


Fay

Lovely Rosette Mark, I would also say a slight lighten on the background, but we all have different tastes
It is healthier to be mutton dressed as lamb, than mutton dressed as mutton!

MarkS


Thanks for the constructive feedback.

What about this version instead?


Larger version:
http://www.markshelley.co.uk/Astronomy/2011/rosette29112011v2.jpg


Carole

#5
I think I prefer the first version Mark from the background point of view.

Carole

RobertM

The first is best for me also.  To my eyes the second looks a little anaemic by comparison (rightly or wrongly)...

julian

Nice image Mark. I prefer the first one.

Julian