Orpington Astronomical Society

Astronomy => Astrophotography => Topic started by: Whitters on Dec 21, 2003, 22:00:00

Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Whitters on Dec 21, 2003, 22:00:00
Nebulosity arround zeta Orions
300mm F2.8 MX916 binned 2x2
5 minutes (5 x 60 second exposure)
Hydrogen alpha filter (lumicron)
(http://homepage.ntlworld.com/paul_whitmarsh/Astronomy/Images/MX916/Dec_20_2003/Flameha.png)
Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Rocket Pooch on Jan 21, 2004, 21:28:00
I need shorter lunch breaks

(http://www.jumpers4goalposts.org.uk/images/Flamehac.gif)
Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Mike on Jan 23, 2004, 02:58:00
Paul that is spectacular !!! You have got to combine that with the colour data from another image.
Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Whitters on Jan 23, 2004, 22:53:00
Say how did you do that Chris???:-D
Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Rocket Pooch on Jan 24, 2004, 01:55:00
2 positive histogram stretch, 1 negative stretch all in Photoshop to bring out the detail.  Smoothed it using SGBNR application then back into Photoshop for a contrast adjustment.

Before the stretch's I masked out the bright stars using a Marquee mask and inversed the selection.

There you go.  

All the data was from your original posted on this forum with no additions at all.

Show you next time we meet.
Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Whitters on Jan 24, 2004, 06:42:00
Well impressed
Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Rocket Pooch on Jan 26, 2004, 03:07:00
All I need is my own Deep Sky camera now and I can stop knicking other peoples work.
Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Rick on Jan 26, 2004, 19:32:00
The top version seems to contain more detail than the lower one, but at a lower overall brightness. The lower one has pulled up the nebulosity but has somehow lost the very faint stars. The tricky thing with image processing is knowing when to stop.
Title: Horsehead Nebula
Post by: Rocket Pooch on Jan 26, 2004, 21:37:00
Yes agreed, the thing is normally you would probably get the star detail and depth from a b/w element and then overlay the cloud detail.

But you're right, too ,much fiddling.