Hi y'all
Ok, here is my first go at stacking the moon (which btw, I didn't even know you could do).
With Carole's help, we used the seven images I had taken on the 14th September.
I have over sharpened (which is another thing I overdo).
I can definitely see more detail this time and when I get a chance I will have another go.
Constructive criticism and advice welcomed but be gentle ;-)
Many thanks
Rachel
(http://gallery.orpington-astronomy.org.uk/albums/userpics/10068/normal_Rachels_First_Stacked_Moon_Cropped.jpg)
Can we have a link to the full sized file please.
Er, how do I do that?
The image itself isn't much bigger. All I have done is cropped it.
Mike - that looks like a full size crop 250mm lens dslr. For moon with dslr you need 600mm plus for decent size.
Rachel - definitely more detail than showing than previous images - to get high res moon images focal length is definitely the way to go however, the longer you go the more tricky focus & vibration etc. become.
John
Quote from: RachelC on Sep 20, 2016, 00:56:49
Er, how do I do that?
The image itself isn't much bigger. All I have done is cropped it.
Ahh that is why the detail seems lacking. As John says you will need a decent focal length for the moon or use a telescope. What lens did you use? (btw - when posting images always include a FULL list of equipment, software, number of shots, settings, etc.)
I should add that we had to stack the Moon manually in Photoshop as Registax just kept crashing/freezing, but I thought that that would be a good exercise for Rachel as it gave her practice on a number of Photoshop tools - in particular layers.
Yes I agree taking a shot of the Moon just with a camera lens is not going to produce as good a result as using a telescope. When you use your ST80 Rachel it will be easier to get better detail and focus. But never the less you have done well to get what you have with a lens.
Carole
Quote from: Carole on Sep 20, 2016, 10:07:07
When you use your ST80 Rachel it will be easier to get better detail and focus. But never the less you have done well to get what you have with a lens.
Oh indeed. much better than my first efforts. Here is my very first moon image I took back in 2001 using a Security CCTV camera:
(http://i.imgur.com/EgzXhYz.jpg)
Hi again
Mike - Yes, as I am only using a dslr and lens (250mm) I am pretty happy with my slow but sure improvements. Unfortunately I can't guarantee that I will ALWAYS remember to include a FULL list of equipment, software, number of shots, settings, etc. but will do my best.
John - Thanks, there is more details isn't there? My first go at stacking the moon! Yeah, I have noticed the difference in the vibration with the different focal lengths.
600mm lens... wow!
Carole - It was a very good exercise for me thank you. Layers are very interesting lol. It will be fun to start using my baby scope. And I am looking forward to getting closer to the moon :-) Thank you - I think I have improved over time and done well with the lens. But I will definitely have a go at finer focus.
See you soon
Rachel
Quote from: Carole on Sep 20, 2016, 10:07:07
I should add that we had to stack the Moon manually in Photoshop as Registax just kept crashing/freezing.
Carole - how did you do that, specifically the rotational alignment?
Rachel - Personally I think the photo is a bit over-exposed, something you can easily fix in Photoshop or Lightroom,and maybe more detail will be visible if you address that. However I have been criticised in the past for making my photos too dark so maybe a second opinion on the exposure.
QuotePersonally I think the photo is a bit over-exposed, something you can easily fix in PhotoshopPersonally I think the photo is a bit over-exposed, something you can easily fix in Photoshop
Actually I think Kenny is right, I just took the image into Photoshop and adjusted the contrast and made the "seas" darker, and it does make quite a bit of difference, give it a go Rachel.
QuoteCarole - how did you do that, specifically the rotational alignment?
I didn't do anything about the rotation as I presumed Rachel had taken the images quite close together.
It was a method I discovered about 18 months ago when I wanted to stacked my comet Lovejoy and DSS Comet mode wouldn't play ball, so I scoured the internet and finally found a method.
You combine images 2 at a time in layers in Photoshop. Reduce the top layer to 50% and slide the top layer until it is in exactly the right position and then flatten the image. (Thus the top layer adds 50% each time).
Then when you have done a few you get for instance A/B, C/D, E/F, G/H (where A & B subs have been combined and C & D etc).
So you then stack AB/CD, EF/GH and then finally ABCD/EFGH to get a final image thus combining 8 images into one.
Hope that makes sense.
Carole
Why not just blend them all as layers?
That's quite a heavy process if you take more than 5-10 snaps.
Provided you use the same process I guess that would work.
Generally this method only needs to be resorted to if software fails.
Carole