how come the date at the top of this thread is 2013?
roger
is it worth splitting this thread, so that the imaging dates are a sticky and then the second posting is a link to the rest of this thread,
otherwise its going to end up as a large post and the original dates will not be seen.
Mac.
I'm not sure what you mean Mac. The first post is the entire set of imaging, observing and DSC dates for the whole year. I edit that post accordingly so it is always up to date.
Quotehow come the date at the top of this thread is 2013?
roger
Roger, because it has been an ongoing live edited post since 2013.
Mac, it also depends if you have your forum settings to show the latest post first or in chronological order. I prefer it in chronological order personally.
i think you have missed what i ment, what i mean is when this tread is about 15 pages long, no one is going to see the original page without going back, ect,
If you split this thread in to two threads, one with the dates as a sticky so that you can always go straight to the dates which can be updated ect in one place and will always be on the top, and add a link on that posting to this, the discussion part of it, ie the bit thats going to get longer.
QuoteMac, it also depends if you have your forum settings to show the latest post first or in chronological order. I prefer it in chronological order personally.
That wont make any difference to what i was trying to explain.
Mac.
Thread split. TBH until it hits multiple pages there really isn't any point, as scroll up (or down if you're that way inclined) does the job just fine, but split anyway.