• Welcome to Orpington Astronomical Society.
 

News:

New version SMF 2.1.4 installed. You may need to clear cookies and login again...

Main Menu

Veil + Bright Doughnut

Started by MarkS, Jul 01, 2008, 21:22:14

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkS


This is the first light with my DIY modded Canon EOS 350D.
Celestron C11 with F6.3 focal reducer. 
22 x 5min exposure. 
This is the full frame but scaled down by a factor of 4.

It's in my "Works in Progress" folder because of one big problem: what on earth is that bright doughnut?  Maybe the bright star is causing flare somewhere in the optical train.  Maybe part of the cause is the glass I used to replace the original IR filter - it doesn't have anti-relective coatings.  Maybe the cause is completely different?

On the original image the doughnut is 310 pixels in diameter i.e. approx 2.4mm on the CCD


Fay

Did you do flat frames, Mark? It's a nice image other than that. It does look reflective though.
It is healthier to be mutton dressed as lamb, than mutton dressed as mutton!

mickw

Hmmmm  forbidden doughnut..............           :)
Growing Old is mandatory - Growing Up is optional

Rick

I guess it could be internal reflection in the replacement glass (from the image of the brightest star off the lower, then off the upper and down through the lower onto the sensor). The shape is consistent with an out-of-focus star through an annular aperture. Catch will be to see whether it appears on other images. Presumably it didn't appear in any images pre-modding?

mickw

If it's an internal reflection caused by the plain glass "filter" shouldn't there be other doughnuts, to a lesser degree, corresponding to other stars ?
You did the same mod to the 300 with no ill effects ?
Wouldn't flats reveal a likely cause ?

The results you are getting your modded cameras still amaze me  :o
Growing Old is mandatory - Growing Up is optional

RobertM

Excellent image but yes that bright ring ... very strange.  Dust produces shadows and won't be very pronounced so it is definitely reflection.  There is one particularly bright star which is likely related but because the reflection is off centre I would imagine there could also be some alignment issue i.e. not all the optical surfaces are parallel.  As has already been mentioned there should be other lesser donuts which might become visible if you stretch the image. 

What's different to the 300d ? or is it just that this problem hasn't been noticed before - it is a fairly bright (mag 4.2) star to image for so long after all.

MarkS

Fay, Mick, yes I take flats.  The flats got rid of a couple of dust bunnies but there's nothing in the flats in the same position as the bright doughnut.

Rick, you asked if it appeared pre-modding.  Dunno.  I bought the camera, modded it and now this is the first picture I've taken with it.

Mick, yes, if it's caused by reflection then in theory there ought to be other doughnuts for other stars.  But this star is much much brighter than the rest.  I've done the same mod to the 300D but this is the first image I've taken with a very bright star in the frame.

Ian

I think the safe bet is internal reflection. You could work out how far away from the image plane it is by it's apparent diameter (focal ratio determines the geometry of the light cone etc, hey you're the mathematician you do the sums :) ).

It's be quicker to look for planar surfaces first though, as I doubt you'd get such a clear out of focus star image from a convex (or concave for that matter) surface. There aren't many to choose from...

MarkS


Ian,

If it comes from a point source then that source would have to be 2.4mm * F6.3 = 16mm in front of the CCD.  But the only thing 16mm in front of the CCD is thin air!! 

I guess I can test the theory by taking a series of shots of a bright star in different positions in the frame and see if the doughnut moves with it.

Doughnuts, I'm beginning to feel hungry ...

Mark



Rick

I'd guess additional images are going to be required...

Ian

Quote from: MarkS on Jul 01, 2008, 22:50:34
If it comes from a point source then that source would have to be 2.4mm * F6.3 = 16mm in front of the CCD.  But the only thing 16mm in front of the CCD is thin air!! 

Hmm, interesting. I've checked your working and agree. I have now put my socks back on. However, I wonder if it's as simple as that. What shape is the light cone when there's a focal reducer in the way?

I've found a website and have a revised location for you. I think the star image is 5.25mm from the CCD, or as it's a reflection, is there a surface 2.625mm from the CCD?

mickw

Knowing how little I know, I think the elements in the focal reducer may be the culprit  :oops:

It seems similar to lens flare, but with cake  :)
Growing Old is mandatory - Growing Up is optional

Ian

not beer then Mick? You're slipping mate.

Got some Mag ribbon too now  :twisted:

mickw

Back home now  :oops:

Now attacking Z from fridge  :)

Oh - mag ribbon - It's not fair - I wanted to burn something down first.......................

Was I thinking that or did I just type it out loud  :-?
Growing Old is mandatory - Growing Up is optional

MarkS


Ian,

Dust on the surface of the glass "filter" is quite a few mm from the CCD but it creates creates a dust bunny much, much smaller then this doughnut.  So I disagree with your 5mm.

I've checked one or two of the subs and I've found that as the star moves across the frame to the right, the doughnut chases it and begins to catch it up.

So it's definitely an internal reflection.  But from what?

Mark